> On Nov 10, 2020, at 11:51 AM, Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 9:42 AM Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Which those changes applied, I get the following oops: >> >> What's your workload? Do you have a reproducer? > > I ran generic/013 linux-to-linux. I'm not able to reproduce the problem. xfstest: mount options: vers=4.2,proto=rdma,sec=sys,rsize=262144,wsize=131072 FSTYP -- nfs PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 manet 5.10.0-rc1-00015-g6d4bab79ed4f #1297 SMP Sat Oct 31 12:56:30 EDT 2020 generic/001 22s ... 22s generic/002 1s ... 2s generic/003 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV generic/004 [not run] O_TMPFILE is not supported generic/005 1s ... 2s generic/006 10s ... 9s generic/007 40s ... 39s generic/008 [not run] xfs_io fzero failed (old kernel/wrong fs?) generic/009 [not run] xfs_io fzero failed (old kernel/wrong fs?) generic/010 [not run] /home/cel/src/xfstests/src/dbtest not built generic/011 6s ... 6s generic/012 [not run] xfs_io fiemap failed (old kernel/wrong fs?) generic/013 9s ... 9s generic/014 10s ... 8s generic/015 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV generic/016 [not run] xfs_io fiemap failed (old kernel/wrong fs?) generic/017 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV generic/018 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV I must be missing something that you have in your environment. -- Chuck Lever
