Re: xfstests generic/263

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 3:52 PM J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 03:59:56PM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 1:49 PM J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Generic/263 is failing whenever client and server both supports
> > > READ_PLUS.
> > >
> > > I'm not even sure the failure is wrong.  The NFS FALLOC operation doesn't
> > > support those other other fallocate modes, are they implemented elsewhere in
> > > the kernel or libc somehow?  Anyway, odd that it would have anything to do with
> > > READ_PLUS.
> >
> > I just ran xfstests, and I'm seeing this too. The test passes using
> > basic READ on v4.2, so there might be something farther down the log
> > that diff is cutting off. I'll see if anything sticks out to me this
> > week.
>
> I think 091 is failing from the same cause, by the way.  I haven't
> investigated any more though.

These tests do a combination of directio reads and buffered reads. I
don't yet understand why this is a problem with READ_PLUS but works
fine for READ

Anna
>
> --b.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux