On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 04:23:34PM -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
>
>
> From: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> After client is done with the COPY operation, it needs to invalidate
> its pagecache (as it did no reading or writing of the data locally)
> and it needs to invalidate it's attributes just like it would have
> for a read on the source file and write on the destination file.
>
> Once the linux server started giving out read delegations to
> read+write opens, the destination file of the copy_file range
> started having delegations and not doing syncup on close of the
> file leading to xfstest failures for generic/430,431,432,433,565.
>
> Reported-by: Murphy Zhou <jencce.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 2e72448b07dc ("NFS: Add COPY nfs operation")
> Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c
> index 142225f0af59..a9074f3366fa 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c
> @@ -356,7 +356,11 @@ static ssize_t _nfs42_proc_copy(struct file *src,
>
> truncate_pagecache_range(dst_inode, pos_dst,
> pos_dst + res->write_res.count);
> -
> + NFS_I(dst_inode)->cache_validity |= (NFS_INO_REVAL_PAGECACHE |
> + NFS_INO_REVAL_FORCED | NFS_INO_INVALID_SIZE |
> + NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR | NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA);
> + NFS_I(src_inode)->cache_validity |= (NFS_INO_REVAL_PAGECACHE |
> + NFS_INO_REVAL_FORCED | NFS_INO_INVALID_ATIME);
> status = res->write_res.count;
> out:
> if (args->sync)
> --
> 2.18.1
Should this be copied to stable@ ?
- Frank
