On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 11:45:27AM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote: > I disagree with this assessment. All of the reporters have been using > ZFS, but this could indicate an absence of testers using other > filesystems. We need someone with a NFS server which has a 4.15+ kernel > and uses a different filesystem which supports ACLs. Honestly I don't think I currently have a regression test for this so it's possible I could have missed something upstream. I haven't seen any reports, though.... ZFS's ACL implementation is very different from any in-tree filesystem's, and given limited time, a filesystem with no prospect of going upstream isn't going to get much attention, so, yes, I'd need to see a reproducer on xfs or ext4 or something. --b.
