Hi Frank, ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Frank van der Linden" <fllinden@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Tigran Mkrtchyan" <tigran.mkrtchyan@xxxxxxx> > Cc: "Anna Schumaker" <anna.schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-nfs" <linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Trond Myklebust" > <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 6:47:42 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] NFS client user xattr (RFC8276) support > On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 06:37:29PM +0200, Mkrtchyan, Tigran wrote: >> Thanks for clarification. >> >> Tigran. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "Anna Schumaker" <anna.schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > To: "Tigran Mkrtchyan" <tigran.mkrtchyan@xxxxxxx> >> > Cc: "linux-nfs" <linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Trond Myklebust" >> > <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Frank van der Linden" >> > <fllinden@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 6:15:06 PM >> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] NFS client user xattr (RFC8276) support >> >> > Hi Tigran, >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 11:59 AM Mkrtchyan, Tigran >> > <tigran.mkrtchyan@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Dear maintainers, >> >> >> >> are those changes considered for 5.8? >> > >> > My understanding is that these patches will be targeting 5.9. >> > >> > Anna > > Hi Tigran, > > Since there is one remaining open issue on the server side changes that needs > signoff from the general fs maintainers, I agreed with Bruce & Chuck to target > 5.9, as the 5.8 merge window is currently already open, and all the activity > is centered around it. > > For the client side, there are no open issues that were flagged, so from my > side it's all ready to go - except for me to post a v3 rebased to > the latest tree, which is easy to do. > > In other words, I think it's ok for the client side to go in to 5.8, but it > probably makes more sense to have it go in to the same version as the server > side, so that's what I proposed to Anna & Trond. Makes sense. Thanks, Tigran. > > - Frank
