On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 11:39:20AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Bruce. > > On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 11:36:58AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 05:25:27PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 05:09:56PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > > It's not the end of the world but a bit hacky. I wonder whether something > > > > like the following would work better for identifying worker type so that you > > > > can do sth like > > > > > > > > if (kthread_fn(current) == nfsd) > > > > return kthread_data(current); > > > > else > > > > return NULL; > > > > > > Yes, definitely more generic, looks good to me. > > > > This is what I'm testing with. > > > > If it's OK with you, could I add your Signed-off-by and take it through > > the nfsd tree? I'll have some other patches that will depend on it. > > Please feel free to use the code however you see fit. Given that it'll be > originating from you, my signed-off-by might not be the right tag. Something > like Original-patch-by should be good (nothing is fine too). OK, I'll do that, thanks! --b.
