On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 12:23:57PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> > On Mar 11, 2020, at 3:59 PM, Frank van der Linden <fllinden@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > This adds the filehandle based functions for the xattr operations
> > that call in to the vfs layer to do the actual work.
>
> Before posting again, use "make C=1" to clear up new sparse
> errors, and scripts/checkpatch.pl to find and correct whitespace
> damage introduced in this series.
Hi Chuck,
Thanks for this comment (and the other ones).
I forgot to run sparse - I have fixed the __be32/int type mismatches
it flagged in my tree.
I ran checkpath.pl before sending these in. Looks like I missed
one line that is too long. The warnings I didn't fix were:
==
WARNING: function definition argument 'struct dentry *' should also have an identifier name
#156: FILE: include/linux/xattr.h:54:
+int __vfs_setxattr_locked(struct dentry *, const char *, const void *, size_t, int, struct inode **);
==
..changing this would make the prototype declaration of that function not
match with the style of the ones around it (which also don't have argument
names in their declarations) - so I decided not to.
The other one is:
===
WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
#46: FILE: fs/nfsd/vfs.c:616:
+ {^INFS4_ACCESS_XAREAD,^INFSD_MAY_READ^I^I^I},$
===
The warning is correct, but the array that is part of, and the surrounding
accessmap arrays, all have the same spacing. So to both silence checkpacth
and make the code look consistent, I'd have to change the spacing in
all those arrays (nfs3_regaccess, nfs3_diraccess, nfs3_anyaccess).
This didn't seem right, so I didn't do it.
I'll be happy to send a separate whitespace cleanup for that, not sure
if it should be part of this series, though.
Frank
