On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 11:15:36AM -0500, bfields wrote: > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 04:19:56PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > > I was a bit surprised that nfs4_map_atomic_open_claim() exists at all, > > but given that it did, I assumed it would be used more uniformly. > > > > So this all implies that Linux NFS server claimed to support NFSv4.1 > > before it actually did - which seems odd. This is just a bug (which are > > expected), but a clear ommission. > > For what it's worth, I did make some attempt to keep 4.1 by default (I meant to say: "keep 4.1 off by default".) > until 3.11 (see d109148111cd "nfsd4: support minorversion 1 by default") > but probably could have communicated that better. This isn't the only > blatant known issue in older code. > > --b.
