Apologizes please ignore this was trying to submit v2 of the ACL patch
and sent the wrong file.
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 4:28 PM Olga Kornievskaia
<olga.kornievskaia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> According to the NFSv4.2 spec if the input and output file is the
> same file, operation should fail with EINVAL. However, linux
> copy_file_range() system call has no such restrictions. Therefore,
> in such case let's return EOPNOTSUPP and allow VFS to fallback
> to doing do_splice_direct(). Also when copy_file_range is called
> on an NFSv4.0 or 4.1 mount (ie., a server that doesn't support
> COPY functionality), we also need to return EOPNOTSUPP and
> fallback to a regular copy.
>
> Fixes xfstest generic/075, generic/091, generic/112, generic/263
> for all NFSv4.x versions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c | 3 ---
> fs/nfs/nfs4file.c | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c
> index ff6f85f..5196bfa 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c
> @@ -329,9 +329,6 @@ ssize_t nfs42_proc_copy(struct file *src, loff_t pos_src,
> };
> ssize_t err, err2;
>
> - if (!nfs_server_capable(file_inode(dst), NFS_CAP_COPY))
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -
> src_lock = nfs_get_lock_context(nfs_file_open_context(src));
> if (IS_ERR(src_lock))
> return PTR_ERR(src_lock);
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4file.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4file.c
> index 45b2322..00d1719 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4file.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4file.c
> @@ -133,8 +133,10 @@ static ssize_t nfs4_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> size_t count, unsigned int flags)
> {
> + if (!nfs_server_capable(file_inode(file_out), NFS_CAP_COPY))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> if (file_inode(file_in) == file_inode(file_out))
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> return nfs42_proc_copy(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out, count);
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
