在 2019/10/1 2:06, Trond Myklebust 写道:
Hi Su,
On Mon, 2019-09-30 at 17:11 +0800, Su Yanjun wrote:
In xfstests generic/465 tests failed. Because O_DIRECT r/w use
async rpc calls, when r/w rpc calls are running concurrently we
may read partial data which is wrong.
For example as follows.
user buffer
/--------\
|XXXX|
rpc0 rpc1
When rpc0 runs it encounters eof so return 0, then another writes
something. When rpc1 runs it returns some data. The total data
buffer contains wrong data.
In this patch we check eof mark for each direct request. If
encounters
eof then set eof mark in the request, when we meet it again report
-EAGAIN error. In nfs_direct_complete we convert -EAGAIN as if read
nothing. When the reader issue another read it will read ok.
Signed-off-by: Su Yanjun <suyj.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfs/direct.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/direct.c b/fs/nfs/direct.c
index 222d711..7f737a3 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/direct.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ struct nfs_direct_req {
bytes_left, /* bytes left to be
sent */
error; /* any reported error
*/
struct completion completion; /* wait for i/o completion */
+ int eof; /* eof mark in the
req */
/* commit state */
struct nfs_mds_commit_info mds_cinfo; /* Storage for cinfo
*/
@@ -380,6 +381,12 @@ static void nfs_direct_complete(struct
nfs_direct_req *dreq)
{
struct inode *inode = dreq->inode;
+ /* read partial data just as read nothing */
+ if (dreq->error == -EAGAIN) {
+ dreq->count = 0;
+ dreq->error = 0;
+ }
+
inode_dio_end(inode);
if (dreq->iocb) {
@@ -413,8 +420,13 @@ static void nfs_direct_read_completion(struct
nfs_pgio_header *hdr)
if (hdr->good_bytes != 0)
nfs_direct_good_bytes(dreq, hdr);
- if (test_bit(NFS_IOHDR_EOF, &hdr->flags))
+ if (dreq->eof)
+ dreq->error = -EAGAIN;
+
+ if (test_bit(NFS_IOHDR_EOF, &hdr->flags)) {
dreq->error = 0;
+ dreq->eof = 1;
+ }
spin_unlock(&dreq->lock);
Thanks for looking into this issue. I agree with your analysis of what
is going wrong in generic/465.
However, I think the problem is greater than just EOF. I think we also
need to look at the generic error handling, and ensure that it handles
a truncated RPC call in the middle of a series of calls correctly.
Please see the two patches I sent you just now and check if they fix
the problem for you.
The patchset you sent works for generic/465.
Thanks a lot
