On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 05:13:47PM -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote: > @@ -1026,7 +1026,8 @@ static __be32 nfsd4_do_lookupp(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fh) > static __be32 > nfsd4_verify_copy(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, > stateid_t *src_stateid, struct nfsd_file **src, > - stateid_t *dst_stateid, struct nfsd_file **dst) > + stateid_t *dst_stateid, struct nfsd_file **dst, > + struct nfs4_stid **stid) > { > __be32 status; > ... > @@ -1072,7 +1073,7 @@ static __be32 nfsd4_do_lookupp(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fh) > __be32 status; > > status = nfsd4_verify_copy(rqstp, cstate, &clone->cl_src_stateid, &src, > - &clone->cl_dst_stateid, &dst); > + &clone->cl_dst_stateid, &dst, NULL); > if (status) > goto out; > > @@ -1260,7 +1261,7 @@ static int nfsd4_do_async_copy(void *data) > > status = nfsd4_verify_copy(rqstp, cstate, ©->cp_src_stateid, > ©->nf_src, ©->cp_dst_stateid, > - ©->nf_dst); > + ©->nf_dst, NULL); > if (status) > goto out; > So both callers pass NULL for the new stid parameter. Looks like that's still true after the full series of patches, too. --b.