Re: [PATCH v2] SUNRPC: fix race to sk_err after xs_error_report

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ben,

On Wed, 2019-10-02 at 07:03 -0400, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
> Since commit 4f8943f80883 ("SUNRPC: Replace direct task wakeups from
> softirq context") there has been a race to the value of the sk_err if both
> XPRT_SOCK_WAKE_ERROR and XPRT_SOCK_WAKE_DISCONNECT are set.  In that case,
> we may end up losing the sk_err value that existed when xs_error_report was
> called.
> 
> Fix this by reverting to the previous behavior: instead of using SO_ERROR
> to retrieve the value at a later time (which might also return sk_err_soft),
> copy the sk_err value onto struct sock_xprt, and use that value to wake
> pending tasks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 4f8943f80883 ("SUNRPC: Replace direct task wakeups from softirq context")
> 8<-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Changes on V2:
> 	- move xprt_err into a hole in struct sock_xprt
> 	- add an memory barrier to ensure the error is visble to the
> 	  error_worker
> 
> ---
>  include/linux/sunrpc/xprtsock.h |  1 +
>  net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c           | 16 ++++++++--------
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/xprtsock.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/xprtsock.h
> index 7638dbe7bc50..a940de03808d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/xprtsock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/xprtsock.h
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ struct sock_xprt {
>  	struct mutex		recv_mutex;
>  	struct sockaddr_storage	srcaddr;
>  	unsigned short		srcport;
> +	int			xprt_err;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * UDP socket buffer size parameters
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> index e2176c167a57..25ff097d6e21 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> @@ -1250,12 +1250,15 @@ static void xs_error_report(struct sock *sk)
>  		goto out;
>  
>  	transport = container_of(xprt, struct sock_xprt, xprt);
> -	err = -sk->sk_err;

It looks like "err" is unused after this change, so can you remove the variable declaration as
well?

Thanks,
Anna

> -	if (err == 0)
> +	transport->xprt_err = -sk->sk_err;
> +	if (transport->xprt_err == 0)
>  		goto out;
>  	dprintk("RPC:       xs_error_report client %p, error=%d...\n",
> -			xprt, -err);
> -	trace_rpc_socket_error(xprt, sk->sk_socket, err);
> +			xprt, -transport->xprt_err);
> +	trace_rpc_socket_error(xprt, sk->sk_socket, transport->xprt_err);
> +
> +	/* barrier ensures xprt_err is set before XPRT_SOCK_WAKE_ERROR */
> +	smp_mb__before_atomic();
>  	xs_run_error_worker(transport, XPRT_SOCK_WAKE_ERROR);
>   out:
>  	read_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
> @@ -2470,7 +2473,6 @@ static void xs_wake_write(struct sock_xprt *transport)
>  static void xs_wake_error(struct sock_xprt *transport)
>  {
>  	int sockerr;
> -	int sockerr_len = sizeof(sockerr);
>  
>  	if (!test_bit(XPRT_SOCK_WAKE_ERROR, &transport->sock_state))
>  		return;
> @@ -2479,9 +2481,7 @@ static void xs_wake_error(struct sock_xprt *transport)
>  		goto out;
>  	if (!test_and_clear_bit(XPRT_SOCK_WAKE_ERROR, &transport->sock_state))
>  		goto out;
> -	if (kernel_getsockopt(transport->sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ERROR,
> -				(char *)&sockerr, &sockerr_len) != 0)
> -		goto out;
> +	sockerr = xchg(&transport->xprt_err, 0);
>  	if (sockerr < 0)
>  		xprt_wake_pending_tasks(&transport->xprt, sockerr);
>  out:




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux