> On May 3, 2019, at 7:18 AM, Trond Myklebust <trondmy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Allow more time for softirqd
Have you thought about performance tests for this one?
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/sunrpc/sched.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/sched.c b/net/sunrpc/sched.c
> index c7e81336620c..6b37c9a4b48f 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/sched.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/sched.c
> @@ -1253,7 +1253,7 @@ static int rpciod_start(void)
> goto out_failed;
> rpciod_workqueue = wq;
> /* Note: highpri because network receive is latency sensitive */
The above comment should be deleted as well.
> - wq = alloc_workqueue("xprtiod", WQ_UNBOUND|WQ_MEM_RECLAIM|WQ_HIGHPRI, 0);
> + wq = alloc_workqueue("xprtiod", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_UNBOUND, 0);
> if (!wq)
> goto free_rpciod;
> xprtiod_workqueue = wq;
--
Chuck Lever
