----- 原始邮件 -----
> 发件人: "Steve Dickson" <SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 收件人: "Jianhong.Yin" <yin-jianhong@xxxxxxx>
> 抄送: linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jiyin@xxxxxxxxxx
> 发送时间: 星期三, 2019年 3 月 06日 上午 2:00:02
> 主题: Re: [PATCH] mount.nfs: fix ignore EBUSY problem in special scenario
>
> Hello,
>
> I apologies for taking so long to get to this...
>
> On 2/28/19 12:08 AM, Jianhong.Yin wrote:
> > now mount.nfs ignore EBUSY when the $dir is a mountpoint,
> > it's not correct in specail scenario for example:
> > $dir is a mountpoint of other filesystem(let's say tmpfs)
> > so we must be sure: current nfs mounting has mounted on $dir, then
> > ignore the EBUSY for user.
> >
> > - if (errno == EBUSY && is_mountpoint(mi->node))
> > + if (errno == EBUSY && is_mountpoint(mi->node) && has_mounted_on(mi->spec,
> > mi->node))
> >
> > reproducer:
> > '''
> > mkdir -p /expdir /mnt/nfsmp /mnt/tmpfs
> > echo "/expdir *(rw,no_root_squash)" >/etc/exports
> > service nfs restart
> > mount -t tmpfs tmpfs /mnt/tmpfs
> > mount -osharecache localhost:/expdir /mnt/nfsmp #success
> > mount -osharecache localhost:/expdir /mnt/nfsmp #mounted already, return
> > 0(pass)
> > mount -osharecache localhost:/expdir /mnt/tmpfs #success
> > mount -osharecache localhost:/expdir /mnt/tmpfs #mounted already, return
> > 0(pass)
> > umount /mnt/nfsmp
> > umount /mnt/tmpfs
> >
> > mount -ocontext=system_u:object_r:xferlog_t:s0,sharecache localhost:/expdir
> > /mnt/nfsmp
> > mount -ocontext=system_u:object_r:user_home_dir_t:s0,sharecache
> > localhost:/expdir /mnt/tmpfs
> > [[ $? = 0 ]] && echo "***test fail: hasn't mounted, should return fail ***"
> >
> > umount /mnt/nfsmp
> What real world problem is this solving or better yet what real world
> situation would something like this be done??
>
> I see this more of a pilot error... no one uses tmpfs to make mount to fail
> (or not fail in this case)... It's just not how tmpfs is used.
replace tmpfs with ext4/xfs ... will get same unexpected result.
>
> Plus who uses -ocontext= this way? If some one is that sophisticated to
> use mount like that.... and get wrong... they need to be a little
> more sophisticated ;-)
>
> Finally, when tmpfs is not in the picture things work as expected....
>
> Maybe I'm missing something... I don't this as a problem or a situation
> the people will run into... again... maybe I'm missing something.
something you missing might be:
"$Dir is a mountpoint" doesn't mean "$Dir has mounted on a nfs:/share you want"
(it might be tmpfs/ext4/xfs/btrfs/... or another nfs that is not your expect)
I know this test path is very ... abnormal. I just think
I think the plane should not ignore "Landing gear failure"(EBUSY), even if the pilot
did a very unconventional operation :)
I'm just want you understand what will happen in this corner corner case.
It's up to you(won't fix/or fix)
Jianhong
>
> steved.
> > '''
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jianhong Yin <yin-jianhong@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > support/include/misc.h | 1 +
> > support/misc/mountpoint.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > utils/mount/stropts.c | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/support/include/misc.h b/support/include/misc.h
> > index 06e2a0c..bd02bfc 100644
> > --- a/support/include/misc.h
> > +++ b/support/include/misc.h
> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ char *generic_make_pathname(const char *, const char *);
> > _Bool generic_setup_basedir(const char *, const char *, char *, const
> > size_t);
> >
> > extern int is_mountpoint(char *path);
> > +extern int has_mounted_on(const char *fsname, const char *dir);
> >
> > /* size of the file pointer buffers for rpc procfs files */
> > #define RPC_CHAN_BUF_SIZE 32768
> > diff --git a/support/misc/mountpoint.c b/support/misc/mountpoint.c
> > index 9f9ce44..7f8a89f 100644
> > --- a/support/misc/mountpoint.c
> > +++ b/support/misc/mountpoint.c
> > @@ -3,9 +3,11 @@
> > * check if a given path is a mountpoint
> > */
> >
> > +#include <stdio.h>
> > #include <string.h>
> > -#include "xcommon.h"
> > +#include <mntent.h>
> > #include <sys/stat.h>
> > +#include "xcommon.h"
> > #include "misc.h"
> >
> > int
> > @@ -38,3 +40,25 @@ is_mountpoint(char *path)
> > free(dotdot);
> > return rv;
> > }
> > +
> > +int
> > +has_mounted_on(const char *fsname, const char *dir)
> > +{
> > + struct mntent *ent;
> > + FILE *fp;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + fp = setmntent("/proc/mounts", "r");
> > + if (fp == NULL) {
> > + perror("[unlikely] setmntent(3) fail");
> > + exit(1);
> > + }
> > + while (NULL != (ent = getmntent(fp))) {
> > + if (!strcmp(ent->mnt_fsname, fsname) && !strcmp(ent->mnt_dir, dir)) {
> > + ret = 1;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + endmntent(fp);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > diff --git a/utils/mount/stropts.c b/utils/mount/stropts.c
> > index a093926..bffb74a 100644
> > --- a/utils/mount/stropts.c
> > +++ b/utils/mount/stropts.c
> > @@ -1081,7 +1081,7 @@ static int nfsmount_fg(struct nfsmount_info *mi)
> > return EX_SUCCESS;
> >
> > #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdiscarded-qualifiers"
> > - if (errno == EBUSY && is_mountpoint(mi->node)) {
> > + if (errno == EBUSY && is_mountpoint(mi->node) &&
> > has_mounted_on(mi->spec, mi->node)) {
> > #pragma GCC diagnostic warning "-Wdiscarded-qualifiers"
> > /*
> > * EBUSY can happen when mounting a filesystem that
> >
>
