On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 02:11:59PM +0100, Rik Theys wrote: > In https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nfs/msg27799.html from 2011, Jeff > Layton describes how/why an NFSv4 ACL does not override the umask like a > posix ACL does. It mentions that it did not work back then and that > something might be done about that. > > What is the status now? When I look at the CentOS 7.6 client/server it > seems this is still not implemented. Is this fixed in newer upstream > versions? If not, are there any plans on finding a solution? I'ts fixed if your NFSv4.2 client and server implement https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8275, which upstream linux client and server now do. For RHEL I believe that change went into 7.4. If that's not working for you, you may need to check that the protocol version is 4.2. --b.
