On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 6:31 AM Luis Henriques <lhenriques@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> <snip>
>
> > +int generic_copy_file_checks(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> > + struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> > + size_t *req_count, unsigned int flags)
> > +{
>
> <snip>
>
> > + /* Don't allow overlapped copying within the same file. */
> > + if (inode_in == inode_out &&
> > + pos_out + count > pos_in &&
> > + pos_out < pos_in + count)
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> I was wondering if, with the above check, it would make sense to also
> have an extra patch changing some filesystems (ceph, nfs and cifs) to
> simply return -EOPNOTSUPP (instead of -EINVAL) when inode_in ==
> inode_out. Something like the diff below (not tested!).
>
> This caught my attention when I was running the latest generic xfstests
> on ceph and realised that I had some new failures due to the recently
> added copy_file_range support in fsx by Darrick. The failures were
> caused by the usage of the same fd both as source and destination.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Luis
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/file.c b/fs/ceph/file.c
> index 189df668b6a0..c22ac60ec0ba 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/file.c
> @@ -1904,7 +1904,7 @@ static ssize_t ceph_copy_file_range(struct file *src_file, loff_t src_off,
> bool do_final_copy = false;
>
> if (src_inode == dst_inode)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> if (ceph_snap(dst_inode) != CEPH_NOSNAP)
> return -EROFS;
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> index 865706edb307..d4f63eae531e 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> @@ -1068,7 +1068,7 @@ ssize_t cifs_file_copychunk_range(unsigned int xid,
> cifs_dbg(FYI, "copychunk range\n");
>
> if (src_inode == target_inode) {
> - rc = -EINVAL;
> + rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> goto out;
> }
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4file.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4file.c
> index 46d691ba04bc..910a2abade92 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4file.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4file.c
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static ssize_t nfs4_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> ssize_t ret;
>
> if (file_inode(file_in) == file_inode(file_out))
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
Please don't change the NFS bits. This is against the NFS
specifications. RFC 7862 15.2.3
(snippet)
SAVED_FH and CURRENT_FH must be different files. If SAVED_FH and
CURRENT_FH refer to the same file, the operation MUST fail with
NFS4ERR_INVAL.
> retry:
> ret = nfs42_proc_copy(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out, count);
> if (ret == -EAGAIN)
