On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 9:09 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 09:18:47AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > I'll drop it if you want, but then I'll just have to come back after > > all the NFS code is merged and do yet more cleanup work. > > IFF we want these NFS "features" we'll have to get it right before > merging the code. But even with that I'd rather fix the glaring > issues you are fixing in your first patches as a priority before > adding more features. In other words: don't worry about NFS, lets > get the existing code right before worrying about the next round > of potential issues. Dave, Do you mind in v2 removing the 'retry, ret=EAGAIN' piece and leave the call to the nfs42_copy_file_range() (with the superblock block check)? If not, I could provide the patch. This is a piece of code that got in as a part of the async copy patches and it was meant for the upcoming server-to-server series. This code will go right back in with the next series. But since dead piece of code is glaring wrong currently by all means let's fix it. Thank you.
