Hi,
I am debugging rarely occurring kernel crashes in svc_process_common
('sunrpc' kernel module) that some of our customers got. Unfortunately,
I am still unable to reproduce these and can see no obvious fix in the
mainline kernel.
Any hints on how to debug the issue further could be very helpful.
The OS is Virtuozzo 7. The crashes happened with at least 2 kernels,
based on 3.10.0-862.11.6 and 3.10.0-693.21.1 from RHEL.
The crashes happened when the customers' systems were writing backups of
some data to NFS shares. NFS 4.1 was used. No RDMA.
The backtrace looks like this:
#0 svc_process_common [sunrpc]
#1 bc_svc_process [sunrpc]
#2 nfs41_callback_svc [nfsv4]
#3 kthread
Each time, the crash happened here:
/* Setup reply header */
rqstp->rq_xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_prep_reply_hdr(rqstp);
'struct svc_xprt' instance rqstp->rq_xprt pointed to was filled with
invalid data. Accessing rqstp->rq_xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_prep_reply_hdr
caused the crash as a result.
I checked the crash dumps and found that the memory page allocated for
that 'struct svc_xprt' (to 'struct svc_sock' that contains it, to be
exact) had been given to another, unrelated, process by that time. So,
it seems, the processing of the backchannel request on these NFS clients
could race with something that called svc_xprt_put() for that 'struct
svc_xprt' instance.
First, I thought that it might be a race between a backchannel request
and umount of the NFS share (although I have no indication that the
customers' system tried to unmount it). So, I added a delay into
bc_svc_process(), opened a file on an NFS share from one NFS client and
replaced the file from another client to make the server recall the
delegation, to trigger a backchannel request. Then - closed the files
and tried to umount the NFS share. Everything went OK, no crash. umount
waited till the backchannel request had been processed by the client, as
it should have.
I am new to this code, so might be missing something obvious. However, I
cannot see at the moment, how bc_svc_process() could race with freeing
of that 'struct svc_sock'.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Evgenii
