Re: "(deleted)" directories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2018-11-02 at 18:38 -0800, Marc Eshel wrote:
> One reason to have different FHs for the same file is that a file can
> be 
> linked from multiple directories.
> Adding the parent inode to the FH help finding the the name of the
> file by 
> looking for the file inode in
> the parent directoy.
> 

No... We've been there and done that. Encoding parent directories in
the filehandle breaks rename, unlink, and makes it a pain to recover
state.
There is no way in hell we're going to commit to support that model.

> Marc.
> 
> linux-nfs-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 11/02/2018 05:15:42 PM:
> 
> > From: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "mbenjami@xxxxxxxxxx" <mbenjami@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "bcodding@xxxxxxxxxx" <bcodding@xxxxxxxxxx>, "malahal@xxxxxxxxx
> > "
> > <malahal@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" 
> <linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: 11/02/2018 05:15 PM
> > Subject: Re: "(deleted)" directories
> > Sent by: linux-nfs-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > On Fri, 2018-11-02 at 18:07 -0400, Matt Benjamin wrote:
> > > It sounds like a pretty good one, that goes to the heart of what
> > > a
> > > specification is
> > > 
> > 
> > While admittedly it is (still) Dia de los Muertos today, I would
> > think
> > that someone who resurrected a part of the NFSv3 spec that has been
> > unused for the full 23 years of its existence might have some
> > explanation for why they did so?
> > 
> > IOW: not being of a particularly religious persuasion, I usually
> > want
> > to understand why features are needed rather than having blind
> > faith in
> > the person who wrote the spec.
> > 
> > > Matt
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Trond Myklebust <
> > > trondmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2018-11-02 at 21:24 +0530, Malahal Naineni wrote:
> > > > > Ben, NFSv3 RFC1813.txt states: "If two file handles from the
> > > > > same
> > > > > server are equal, they must refer to the same file, but if
> > > > > they  are
> > > > > not equal, no conclusions can be drawn." Ganesha does return
> > > > > same
> > > > > fileid here (inode).
> > > > > 
> > > > > In NFSv4, they have introduced "unique_handles" attribute. I
> > > > > don't
> > > > > see
> > > > > Linux NFS client using this at all though.
> > > > 
> > > > Why does your server need to have multiple filehandles refer to
> > > > the
> > > > same file, and why do you expect clients to support this?
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, the spec allows it, but that's not a sufficient reason.
> > > > 
> > > > > Regards, Malahal.
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 4:35 PM Benjamin Coddington <
> > > > > bcodding@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > On 2 Nov 2018, at 1:26, Malahal Naineni wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Hi All, we are using NFS-Ganesha with Linux NFS clients.
> > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > client's
> > > > > > > shell reports the following. Based on lsof, the directory
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > marked
> > > > > > > deleted. "cd to ROOT and cd to the same home directory
> > > > > > > fixes
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > issue. The client behaves as though the directory is
> > > > > > > deleted
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > recreated! Our NFS-Ganesha server implementation uses
> > > > > > > multiple
> > > > > > > file
> > > > > > > handles that point to the same object. NFS spec says this
> > > > > > > should
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > fine, but Linux NFS seems to be broken in this regard.
> > > > > > > tcpdump
> > > > > > > does
> > > > > > > indicate file handle change (note that all file handles
> > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > permanent,
> > > > > > > meaning they are valid at the server any time) around
> > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > issue
> > > > > > > time.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > "shell-init: error retrieving current directory: getcwd:
> > > > > > > cannot
> > > > > > > access
> > > > > > > parent directories: No such file or directory"
> > > > > > > sh        112544            malahal  cwd       DIR
> > > > > > > 0,67
> > > > > > >      65536   45605209 /home/malahal (deleted)
> > > > > > > (10.120.154.42:/nfs/malahal-export/)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Function nfs_prime_dcache() seems to invalidate the
> > > > > > > dcache
> > > > > > > entry
> > > > > > > if
> > > > > > > nfs_same_file() returns false. nfs_same_file() does seem
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > return
> > > > > > > false with the following change, if I read it correctly,
> > > > > > > if
> > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > is a
> > > > > > > file handle change. Can this be the source of my issue?
> > > > > > > It
> > > > > > > seems
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > the client should do this only if the file handle is NOT
> > > > > > > valid
> > > > > > > (e.g.
> > > > > > > if it gets ESTALE), right?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > The following commit seems to assume that the objects are
> > > > > > > different if
> > > > > > > they have different file handles!
> > > > > > > commit 7dc72d5f7a0ec97a53e126c46e2cbd2560757955
> > > > > > > Author: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > Date:   Thu Sep 22 13:38:52 2016 -0400
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > >     NFS: Fix inode corruption in nfs_prime_dcache()
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > My understanding is that for NFSv3 we have to assume that
> > > > > > distinct
> > > > > > filehandles are distinct objects, but maybe I'm wrong about
> > > > > > this.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > For NFSv4.x, we can follow the guidance in RFCs 5661 or
> > > > > > 7530
> > > > > > section 10.3.4
> > > > > > to determine if the differing filehandles are the same
> > > > > > object,
> > > > > > specifically
> > > > > > the fileid recommended attribute needs to be
> > > > > > implemented.  Is
> > > > > > Ganesha
> > > > > > returning the same fileid for both filehandles?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Ben
> > > > --
> > > > Trond Myklebust
> > > > CTO, Hammerspace Inc
> > > > 4300 El Camino Real, Suite 105
> > > > Los Altos, CA 94022
> > > > www.hammer.space
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > -- 
> > Trond Myklebust
> > CTO, Hammerspace Inc
> > 4300 El Camino Real, Suite 105
> > Los Altos, CA 94022
> > www.hammer.space
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
-- 
Trond Myklebust
CTO, Hammerspace Inc
4300 El Camino Real, Suite 105
Los Altos, CA 94022
www.hammer.space






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux