Re: [PATCH] [nfs-utils] fix issue: mount -osharecache failure but return 'true'

[Jianhong Yin <jiyin@xxxxxxxxxx>]

----- 原始邮件 -----
> 发件人: "Jianhong Yin" <jiyin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 收件人: "Steve Dickson" <SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 抄送: "尹剑虹" <yin-jianhong@xxxxxxx>, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 发送时间: 星期一, 2018年 10 月 22日 上午 10:56:31
> 主题: Re: [PATCH] [nfs-utils] fix issue: mount -osharecache failure but return 'true'
> 
> 
> ----- 原始邮件 -----
> > 发件人: "Steve Dickson" <SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 收件人: "尹剑虹" <yin-jianhong@xxxxxxx>
> > 抄送: jiyin@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 发送时间: 星期六, 2018年 10 月 20日 下午 10:35:48
> > 主题: Re: [PATCH] [nfs-utils] fix issue: mount -osharecache failure but
> > return 'true'
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > On 10/19/18 11:31 PM, 尹剑虹 wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi Steved
> > > 
> > > The scenario is: these two mountings use different "context=" and
> > > sharecache option, in this case mount(2) return fail with EBUSY.
> > Fair enough.... I did miss the different contexts...
> > 
> > But we already have a routine that check mount points
> > is_mountpoint() used my mountd. I would rather use that.

Hi Sir

  I reviewed function is_mountpoint(), seems it just check if the mountpoint is a root-fs，
  our goal is check if special dev has been mounted on specail path.

  WDYT?

> Got it, good to know.
> 
> > 
> > I'll resend the patch...
> > 
> > Thanks!!
> > 
> > steved.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Jianhong
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 	
> > > 尹剑虹
> > > 邮箱：yin-jianhong@xxxxxxx
> > > 
> > > <https://maas.mail.163.com/dashi-web-extend/html/proSignature.html?iconUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fmail-online.nosdn.127.net%2Fqiyelogo%2FdefaultAvatar.png&name=%E5%B0%B9%E5%89%91%E8%99%B9&uid=yin-jianhong%40163.com&ftlId=1&items=%5B%22%E9%82%AE%E7%AE%B1%EF%BC%9Ayin-jianhong%40163.com%22%5D>
> > > 
> > > 签名由 网易邮箱大师 <https://mail.163.com/dashi/dlpro.html?from=mail88> 定制
> > > 
> > >         On 10/20/2018 01:36, Steve Dickson <mailto:SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >         wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > >         On 10/19/18 4:03 AM, jiyin@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >         > From: "Jianhong.Yin" <yin-jianhong@xxxxxxx>
> > >         >
> > >         > see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629705
> > >         > mount.nfs4 -o
> > >         > context=system_u:object_r:user_home_dir_t:s0,sharecache
> > >         > $serv:$expdir $nfsmp
> > >         > mount.nfs4 -o context=system_u:object_r:xferlog_t:s0,sharecache
> > >         > $serv:$expdir $nfsmp2
> > >         > ^^^ here mount fail, but return true. it confuse user!
> > >         Why should it fail? Two different mounts are being used and using
> > >         -o sharecache
> > >         which is the default the way...
> > > 
> > >         steved.
> > >         >
> > >         > according:
> > >         > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10602607/#22234047
> > >         > add function is_mounted_already()
> > >         > -          if (errno == EBUSY)
> > >         > +          if (errno == EBUSY && is_mounted_already(mi->spec,
> > >         > mi->node))
> > >         >                return EX_SUCCESS;
> > >         >
> > >         > Signed-off-by: Jianhong Yin <yin-jianhong@xxxxxxx>
> > >         > ---
> > >         >  utils/mount/stropts.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > >         >  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >         >
> > >         > diff --git a/utils/mount/stropts.c b/utils/mount/stropts.c
> > >         > index 4d2e37e..4be7e61 100644
> > >         > --- a/utils/mount/stropts.c
> > >         > +++ b/utils/mount/stropts.c
> > >         > @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
> > >         >  #include "version.h"
> > >         >  #include "parse_dev.h"
> > >         >  #include "conffile.h"
> > >         > +#include <mntent.h>
> > >         >  
> > >         >  #ifndef NFS_PROGRAM
> > >         >  #define NFS_PROGRAM     (100003)
> > >         > @@ -1056,6 +1057,27 @@ static int nfs_is_permanent_error(int
> > >         > error)
> > >         >       }
> > >         >  }
> > >         >  
> > >         > +static int is_mounted_already(const char *fsname, const char
> > >         > *dir)
> > >         > +{
> > >         > +     struct mntent *ent;
> > >         > +     FILE *fp;
> > >         > +     int ret = 0;
> > >         > +
> > >         > +     fp = setmntent("/proc/mounts", "r");
> > >         > +     if (fp == NULL) {
> > >         > +          perror("[unlikely] setmntent(3) fail");
> > >         > +          exit(1);
> > >         > +     }
> > >         > +     while (NULL != (ent = getmntent(fp))) {
> > >         > +          if (!strcmp(ent->mnt_fsname, fsname) &&
> > >         > !strcmp(ent->mnt_dir, dir)) {
> > >         > +               ret = 1;
> > >         > +               break;
> > >         > +          }
> > >         > +     }
> > >         > +     endmntent(fp);
> > >         > +     return ret;
> > >         > +}
> > >         > +
> > >         >  /*
> > >         >   * Handle "foreground" NFS mounts.
> > >         >   *
> > >         > @@ -1078,13 +1100,8 @@ static int nfsmount_fg(struct
> > >         > nfsmount_info *mi)
> > >         >            if (nfs_try_mount(mi))
> > >         >                 return EX_SUCCESS;
> > >         >  
> > >         > -          if (errno == EBUSY)
> > >         > -               /* The only cause of EBUSY is if exactly the
> > >         > desired
> > >         > -                * filesystem is already mounted.  That can
> > >         > arguably
> > >         > -                * be seen as success.  "mount -a" tries to
> > >         > optimise
> > >         > -                * out this case but sometimes fails.  Help it
> > >         > out
> > >         > -                * by pretending everything is rosy
> > >         > -                */
> > >         > +          /* if EBUSY is caused by re-mount, ignore the error
> > >         > */
> > >         > +          if (errno == EBUSY && is_mounted_already(mi->spec,
> > >         > mi->node))
> > >         >                 return EX_SUCCESS;
> > >         >  
> > >         >            if (nfs_is_permanent_error(errno))
> > >         >
> > > 
> > 
>