From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> We're encoding a single op in the reply but leaving the number of ops zero, so the reply makes no sense. Somewhat academic as this isn't a case any real client will hit, though in theory perhaps that could change in a future protocol extension. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c index 140b05c8a4be..3652f9b1fb68 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c @@ -1735,6 +1735,7 @@ nfsd4_proc_compound(struct svc_rqst *rqstp) if (status) { op = &args->ops[0]; op->status = status; + resp->opcnt = 1; goto encode_op; } -- 2.17.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html