>On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 02:01:34PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: >> On 6/1/2018 10:45 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote: >> > Fix memory leak in smack_inode_getsecctx >> > >> > The implementation of smack_inode_getsecctx() made >> > incorrect assumptions about how Smack presents a security >> > context. Smack does not need to allocate memory to support >> > security contexts, so "releasing" a Smack context is a no-op. >> > The code made an unnecessary copy and returned that as a >> > context, which was never freed. The revised implementation >> > returns the context correctly. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Tejun, does this pass your tests? >Oh, I'm not the one who reported. Chandan? Looks good to me. Leak not found. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
