"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Apologies for the slow response, this looks right, I'm just still trying > to figure out whether this is the only problem here--e.g. does it cause > problems to have this lease temporarily applied before the delegation is > hashed? So the only thing I can currently theorize is that we might eject some recalls for delegations that will never hit the wire. I think the worst possibility is that nfsd4_cb_recall_done() might wind up declaring the callback path to be down? Still looking... Thanks, Andy -- Andrew W. Elble aweits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Infrastructure Engineer, Communications Technical Lead Rochester Institute of Technology PGP: BFAD 8461 4CCF DC95 DA2C B0EB 965B 082E 863E C912 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
