On Wed 25-04-18 00:18:40, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am Dienstag, 24. April 2018, 21:28:03 CEST schrieb Michal Hocko: > > > Also only for debugging. > > > Getting rid of vmalloc with GFP_NOFS in UBIFS is no big problem. > > > I can prepare a patch. > > > > Cool! > > > > Anyway, if UBIFS has some reclaim recursion critical sections in general > > it would be really great to have them documented and that is where the > > scope api is really handy. Just add the scope and document what is the > > recursion issue. This will help people reading the code as well. Ideally > > there shouldn't be any explicit GFP_NOFS in the code. > > So in a perfect world a filesystem calls memalloc_nofs_save/restore and > always uses GFP_KERNEL for kmalloc/vmalloc? Exactly! And in a dream world those memalloc_nofs_save act as a documentation of the reclaim recursion documentation ;) -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
