On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 09:57:08AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 09:43:45AM -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote: > > > On Apr 17, 2018, at 9:41 AM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Christoph said: "I'd like to see numbers for actual, real use cases." > > > Yes, I'd love to see that too. > > > > > > Is it possible to get testing on real hardware that we'd expect people > > > to use, with sufficient details about the setup that someone else could > > > reproduce the results? > > > > The numbers we presented was on real hardware. If you have any more questions regarding the setup please ask. > > Argh, sorry, you had to remind me once already: > > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4/current/msg15379.html And there was a digression on the commit behavior, but important point to me was that it looked like the server-server copy was something close to what the hardware could do. (Well, 800-900Mb/s on gigabit, I assume that's not bad.) --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
