On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 16:39 -0500, bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 08:09:01AM -0500, Scott Mayhew wrote:
> > Yes, this works. I ran it through a dozen fio runs on v4.1 and
> > 1000 runs
> > of generic/247 on v3/v4.0/v4.1/v4.2 and didn't see any EBUSY
> > errors.
> > Also ran the xfstests "quick" group (~80-90 tests) plus generic/074
> > on
> > v3/v4.0/v4.1/v4.2. Finally, I double checked the panic on umount
> > issue
> > that dc4fd9ab01ab3 fixed and that still works too.
>
> Works for me too.
>
> (Yeah, I see there's a new patch. Testing queued up but not run
> yet...).
Sorry for pulling the "new patch switch" on you both, but I figured it
would be better to re-examine where the requirement for the dirty flag
is coming from, and to ensure that we meet that requirement once and
for all.
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData
trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��w��� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
