On 02/23/2018 12:05 PM, Olga Kornievskaia wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:24 AM, Steve Dickson <SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hey Olga, >> >> On 02/22/2018 02:28 PM, Olga Kornievskaia wrote: >>> It is possible that userland can pass to the kernel mismatching >>> inputs for the minorversion. like vers=4.1,minorversion=0. Instead >>> of making the kernel responposible for 'choosing' the minorversion, >>> make the userland always responsible for not sending a mismatch. >> I'm thinking this is probably more of mount problem... > > Yes the problem is a broken user land sending incorrect arguments but > I still think the kernel needs to do sanity checking on arguments to > prevent this from happening again. > >> mount -t nfs4 -o minorversion=0 server:/export /mnt >> >> shouldn't this be a v4.0 mount instead of a 4.2 mount? > > Yes I would think this should create a v4.0 mount. Way back when... there was some talk about deprecating minorversion= flag... Since it is broken, maybe this is a good time to do it? Thoughts? steved. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
