On 14 Feb 2018, at 10:29, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 10:21 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: >> On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 10:05 -0500, Benjamin Coddington wrote: >>> Hi Olga, >>> >>> On 13 Feb 2018, at 15:08, Olga Kornievskaia wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Trond Myklebust >>>> <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> ... >>> Ah, good question there.. Even though the stateid is not useful >>> for >>> operations that follow, I think the sequenceid should be >>> incremented because >>> the CLOSE is an operation that modifies the set of locks or state: >>> >> >> It doesn't matter. Yes, good condensed point. It doesn't matter. >>> ... > Is there a proposal to change the current client behaviour here? As far > as I can tell, the answer is "no". Am I missing something? Not that I can see. I think we're just comparing linux and netapp server behaviors.. Ben -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
