On Wed, 2018-02-07 at 17:42 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28 2018, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>
> > We don't need to call unmap_mapping_range() prior to calling
> > nfs_sync_mapping().
>
> Don't we?
See line 2 of nfs_sync_mapping(). ☺
> Doesn't that allow a process which mapped the page to dirty it
> immediately after nfs_sync_mapping(), without the page being
> reloaded from the server first?
> Doesn't seem right..
>
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/nfs/inode.c | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c
> > index deeb7d1097d0..49fba9ea5872 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c
> > @@ -1170,7 +1170,6 @@ static int nfs_invalidate_mapping(struct
> > inode *inode, struct address_space *map
> >
> > if (mapping->nrpages != 0) {
> > if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) {
> > - unmap_mapping_range(mapping, 0, 0, 0);
> > ret = nfs_sync_mapping(mapping);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> > --
> > 2.14.3
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
> > nfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData
trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
