On Fri, Jan 12, Chuck Lever wrote: > > On Jan 12, 2018, at 1:05 PM, Guillem Jover <gjover@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [F] <https://sources.debian.org/src/glibc/2.26-3/debian/patches/any/local-bindresvport_blacklist.diff/> > > > > On the above Debian bug report, it was proposed to make libtirpc switch > > to use the libc bindresvport() implementation so that at least on those > > distributions where it is locally patched it would honor the > > /etc/bindresvport.blacklist file. The problem with this, is of course > > that it does not help any upstream code on any other non-patched system. > > The community issue here is that there have evolved, over time, > multiple RPC libraries with divergent capabilities. The only way > to truly address this confusion is to eliminate all but one of > them, which is far outside the scope of your bug fix. For now we > have to live with it. openSUSE is removing sunrpc from glibc, Fedora seems to be removing sunrpc from glibc, so it's only a matter of time when libtirpc is the only RPC implementation used on Linux. Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk, Distinguished Engineer, Senior Architect SLES & CaaSP SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
