Dear Developers: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197817 > > --- Comment #1 from bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx --- > Yes, I think you're right. > > Would it be possible for you to submit a patch to fix that typo in those two > places? (Just mail it to me at bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx, cc: to > linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx). > OK, I have attached the patch. > It might also be useful to see your original oops. Sorry, I have the only handwriting memo of console messages. Maybe useless, but I also attach its scanned copy. Sincerely yours Naofumi Honda
Attachment:
oops_memo.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
*** linux-4.9.60/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c.org 2017-11-09 09:49:11.071026183 +0900
--- linux-4.9.60/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c 2017-11-09 09:51:36.370697280 +0900
***************
*** 4677,4683 ****
spin_unlock(&nn->blocked_locks_lock);
while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
! nbl = list_first_entry(&nn->blocked_locks_lru,
struct nfsd4_blocked_lock, nbl_lru);
list_del_init(&nbl->nbl_lru);
posix_unblock_lock(&nbl->nbl_lock);
--- 4677,4683 ----
spin_unlock(&nn->blocked_locks_lock);
while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
! nbl = list_first_entry(&reaplist,
struct nfsd4_blocked_lock, nbl_lru);
list_del_init(&nbl->nbl_lru);
posix_unblock_lock(&nbl->nbl_lock);
***************
*** 7071,7077 ****
spin_unlock(&nn->blocked_locks_lock);
while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
! nbl = list_first_entry(&nn->blocked_locks_lru,
struct nfsd4_blocked_lock, nbl_lru);
list_del_init(&nbl->nbl_lru);
posix_unblock_lock(&nbl->nbl_lock);
--- 7071,7077 ----
spin_unlock(&nn->blocked_locks_lock);
while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
! nbl = list_first_entry(&reaplist,
struct nfsd4_blocked_lock, nbl_lru);
list_del_init(&nbl->nbl_lru);
posix_unblock_lock(&nbl->nbl_lock);
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
