The use of the st_mutex has been confusing the validator. Use the
proper nested notation so as to not produce warnings.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Elble <aweits@xxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 0d98d73bd84e..755b33284979 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -3548,7 +3548,7 @@ static void nfs4_free_openowner(struct nfs4_stateowner *so)
{
__be32 ret;
- mutex_lock(&stp->st_mutex);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&stp->st_mutex, 1);
ret = nfsd4_verify_open_stid(&stp->st_stid);
if (ret != nfs_ok)
mutex_unlock(&stp->st_mutex);
@@ -3612,7 +3612,7 @@ static void nfs4_free_openowner(struct nfs4_stateowner *so)
stp = open->op_stp;
/* We are moving these outside of the spinlocks to avoid the warnings */
mutex_init(&stp->st_mutex);
- mutex_lock(&stp->st_mutex);
+ mutex_lock_nested(&stp->st_mutex, 0);
retry:
spin_lock(&oo->oo_owner.so_client->cl_lock);
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
