> On Oct 12, 2017, at 8:17 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 04:53:07PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: >>> On Oct 5, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> An unchanging public reference to a specification of VSOCK is >> important to cite. If you can't find one, you'll have to explain >> why in the document. If the VSOCK specification is not an IETF >> document, it will have to be an Informative reference, and this >> I-D will also have to be Informative. > > There is no formal specification. VMware has published developer > documentation that explains the use of VSOCK in the context of VMware > products. If there is nothing else, this is the most appropriate reference to cite. It provides a description of the technology made by the agent who invented and ultimately controls it (we believe: it may be that someone else did, and VMware is just taking credit; I think we need to know that too). You should contact VMware to see if they have anything more, and to ask if they already have NFS on VSOCK. Let them know you are submitting standards in this area. > I will submit a vsock(7) man page to the Linux man-pages project > (similar to ip(7), tcp(7), etc). It will document the semantics of the > AF_VSOCK address family. Maybe this can serve as a reference? The IESG will ultimately decide, but IMO citing a man page that you wrote would not be adequate unless you yourself invented the VSOCK technology. -- Chuck Lever -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html