Hello, On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 04:48:57PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. What I'm not really understanding here > though, is how the work item could be queued at all. We have a > wait_on_bit_lock() in xprt_destroy() that should mean the xprt- > >task_cleanup work item has completed running, and that it cannot be > requeued. > > Is there a possibility that the flush_queue() might be triggered > despite the work item not being queued? Yeah, for sure. The lockdep annotations don't distinguish those cases and assume the worst case. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
