Hi Stefan, On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have previously submitted patches that implement NFS client and nfsd > support for the AF_VSOCK address family. In order for this to be > acceptable for merge the AF_VSOCK transport needs to be defined in an > IETF RFC. Below is a draft RFC that defines ONC RPC over AF_VSOCK. > > My patches use netid "vsock" but "tcpv" has also been suggested. This draft > RFC still uses "vsock" but I'll update it to "tcpv" if there is consensus. > I think "vsock" is the appropriate netid, not "tcpv." Stream orientation, if anything, is the general category containing TCP and VSOCK, not the reverse. But really I think it's just more clear. I think this draft needs to be sent to the IETF NFSv4 working group alias, nfsv4@xxxxxxxx. Matt -- Matt Benjamin Red Hat, Inc. 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage tel. 734-821-5101 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
