Commit c87fb4a378f9 ("lockd: NLM grace period shouldn't block NFSv4 opens")
made the locks_in_grace() comment be in the wrong place.
This patch move this comment just at the right place.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@xxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfs_common/grace.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs_common/grace.c b/fs/nfs_common/grace.c
index 519396967e79..c030cd618b99 100644
--- a/fs/nfs_common/grace.c
+++ b/fs/nfs_common/grace.c
@@ -55,13 +55,6 @@ locks_end_grace(struct lock_manager *lm)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(locks_end_grace);
-/**
- * locks_in_grace
- *
- * Lock managers call this function to determine when it is OK for them
- * to answer ordinary lock requests, and when they should accept only
- * lock reclaims.
- */
static int
__state_in_grace(struct net *net, bool open)
{
@@ -78,6 +71,13 @@ __state_in_grace(struct net *net, bool open)
return false;
}
+/**
+ * locks_in_grace
+ *
+ * Lock managers call this function to determine when it is OK for them
+ * to answer ordinary lock requests, and when they should accept only
+ * lock reclaims.
+ */
int locks_in_grace(struct net *net)
{
return __state_in_grace(net, 0);
--
2.13.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
