On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 05:45:47PM -0400, bfields wrote: > I finally got around to looking at the delegation self-conflict problem > you asked me about: it looks not hard at all to make the server stop > revoking delegation in cases it's the client modifiying the file (or > metatadata), as long as we're in the 4.1 case or otherwise know which > client we're dealing with. I should post patches next week. Hah. My first attempt didn't work, so it took longer than expected. The second attempt looks good, but needs some testing. That'll have to wait a couple weeks--I'm going to be mostly offline for a while. --b. > > Remind me how you expect to take advantage of this? I think you wanted > to eliminate some cases where the client has to preemptively return > delegations, but don't you then need some way to know ahead of time what > the server behavior is? > > --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
