So if it's not too depressing I'd be curious what went wrong--did this turn out to be harder than we thought to get stable, or are people happy enough with automounting, or did we just not do a good job of explaining it to people that might use it, or some combination of all those? --b. On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 11:01:05AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > Upstream fedfs-utils has not been under active development for > two years or more, and there is a scant user base. I'd like to > propose making 0.10 the final major release of fedfs-utils. > > The plan: > > - Since 0.10 is in at least one major enterprise distribution, > I will remain available to integrate security fixes and make > new minor releases in the 0.10 line, as needed, for one to > two more years. > > - Retire and remove fedfs-utils from upstream mirror distros > such as Fedora rawhide. > > - Transfer utilities such as nfsref into nfs-utils, with > support for FedFS junctions removed. > > - Announcements of the change in status will be made on > fedfs-utils-announce and on the wiki.linux-nfs.org site. > > > > Comments welcome! > > > -- > Chuck Lever > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
