Hi Trond- > On Apr 28, 2017, at 1:25 PM, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Allow the user to specify that the client should use multiple connections > to the server. For the moment, this functionality will be limited to > TCP and to NFSv4.x (x>0). Some initial reactions: - 5/5 could be squashed into this patch (2/5). - 4/5 adds support for using NFSv3 with a DS. Why can't you add NFSv3 support for multiple connections in the non-pNFS case? If there is a good reason, it should be stated in 4/5's patch description or added as a comment somewhere in the source code. - Testing with a Linux server shows that the basic NFS/RDMA pieces work, but any OPEN operation gets NFS4ERR_GRACE, forever, when I use nconnect > 1. I'm looking into it. - Testing with a Solaris 12 server prototype that supports NFSv4.1 works fine with nconnect=[23]. Not seeing much performance improvement there because the server is using QDR and a single SATA SSD. Thus I don't see a strong need to keep the TCP-only limitation. However, if you do keep it, the logic that implements the second sentence in the patch description above is added in 3/5. Should this sentence be in that patch description instead? Or, instead: s/For the moment/In a subsequent patch > Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/nfs/internal.h | 1 + > fs/nfs/super.c | 10 ++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/internal.h b/fs/nfs/internal.h > index 31b26cf1b476..31757a742e9b 100644 > --- a/fs/nfs/internal.h > +++ b/fs/nfs/internal.h > @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ struct nfs_parsed_mount_data { > char *export_path; > int port; > unsigned short protocol; > + unsigned short nconnect; > } nfs_server; > > struct security_mnt_opts lsm_opts; > diff --git a/fs/nfs/super.c b/fs/nfs/super.c > index 54e0f9f2dd94..7eb48934dc79 100644 > --- a/fs/nfs/super.c > +++ b/fs/nfs/super.c > @@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ > #define NFS_DEFAULT_VERSION 2 > #endif > > +#define NFS_MAX_CONNECTIONS 16 > + > enum { > /* Mount options that take no arguments */ > Opt_soft, Opt_hard, > @@ -107,6 +109,7 @@ enum { > Opt_nfsvers, > Opt_sec, Opt_proto, Opt_mountproto, Opt_mounthost, > Opt_addr, Opt_mountaddr, Opt_clientaddr, > + Opt_nconnect, > Opt_lookupcache, > Opt_fscache_uniq, > Opt_local_lock, > @@ -179,6 +182,8 @@ static const match_table_t nfs_mount_option_tokens = { > { Opt_mounthost, "mounthost=%s" }, > { Opt_mountaddr, "mountaddr=%s" }, > > + { Opt_nconnect, "nconnect=%s" }, > + > { Opt_lookupcache, "lookupcache=%s" }, > { Opt_fscache_uniq, "fsc=%s" }, > { Opt_local_lock, "local_lock=%s" }, > @@ -1544,6 +1549,11 @@ static int nfs_parse_mount_options(char *raw, > if (mnt->mount_server.addrlen == 0) > goto out_invalid_address; > break; > + case Opt_nconnect: > + if (nfs_get_option_ul_bound(args, &option, 1, NFS_MAX_CONNECTIONS)) > + goto out_invalid_value; > + mnt->nfs_server.nconnect = option; > + break; > case Opt_lookupcache: > string = match_strdup(args); > if (string == NULL) > -- > 2.9.3 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Chuck Lever -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html