On 04/20/2017 11:18 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: <> > > OK. I'm applying this patch for the 4.12 merge window. That is understandable this code was not tested for a long while > If, as Boaz > suggests, there is still an interest in exofs, then I suggest we put > that to the test by moving it into the STAGING area, to see if someone > will step up to maintain it. > I do not understand what you mean by "someone will maintain it" What is it that is missing in exofs that you see needs development? As I said I regularly run and test this FS and update as things advance there where no new fixtures for a while, but no regressions either. Please explain what it means "will maintain it" > Cheers > Trond > Thanks Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
