> On Jan 24, 2017, at 14:40, Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Trond Myklebust
> <trondmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 24, 2017, at 14:06, Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Trond,
>>>
>>> Is there a reason that nfs4_proc_reclaim_complete() isn't wrapped
>>> with a do while() to handle errors?
>>
>> What do we not already handle correctly in nfs4_reclaim_complete_done()?
>
> Could this be because when an error occurs rpc_done isn't called
> (rpc_release is called)? What I see is that if RECLAIM_COMPLETE gets
> an error (BAD_SESSION) the client just ignores it.
>
That’s correct. Why do we need to handle BAD_SESSION there? We’re done with state recovery, so if the server rebooted, we can catch that later.��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��w��� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
