On 12/01/2016 10:58 PM, NeilBrown wrote: > This is an RFC series. A little voice at the back of my head keeps > telling me that I'm over-engineering, but there isn't really that much > new code, and I think the result has a lot to recommend it. > > But please tell me if I'm wrong. > > - Various daemons (not all) are enhance to accept configuration > information from /etc/nfs.conf > - the conffile reader is enhanced to support include files, and > particularly to be able to include /etc/sysconf/X or /etc/defaults/X > files usefully > - nfs-config.service is removed, because it isn't really needed with > the above. > - documentation for all the above is provided, including a new > nfs.systemd man page which gives the bigger picture. > Here is the nfs.conf I will be using to do my testing... I'm just wondering if this is something we should put in the git tree? # # This is a general conifguration for the # NFS daemons and tools # #[nfsdcltrack] # storagedir=/var/lib/nfs/nfsdcltrack # #[nfsd] # threads=8 # grace-time=90 # lease-time=90 # udp=y # tcp=y # vers2=n # vers3=y # vers4=y # vers4.0=y # vers4.1=y # vers4.2=y # rdma=n # #[mountd] # manage_gids=n # descriptors=0 # port=42258 # threads=1 # reverse-lookup=n # state-directory-path=/var/lib/nfs # ha-callout=NULL # #[statd] # port=0 # outgoing-port=0 # name=NULL # state-directory-path=/var/lib/nfs/statd # ha-callout=NULL # #[lockd] # port=0 # udp-port=0 # #[sm-notify] # retry-time=900 # outgoing-port=NULL # outgoing-addr=NULL # -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
