There is no change to the value of NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN, so we should
not be waking up the RPC call.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index 471018f27c8d..a64d1e40dba9 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -420,8 +420,6 @@ static void
pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
{
- struct inode *inode = lo->plh_inode;
-
WARN_ON(test_bit(NFS_LSEG_VALID, &lseg->pls_flags));
list_del_init(&lseg->pls_list);
/* Matched by pnfs_get_layout_hdr in pnfs_layout_insert_lseg */
@@ -433,7 +431,6 @@ pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
set_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_INVALID_STID, &lo->plh_flags);
clear_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_BULK_RECALL, &lo->plh_flags);
}
- rpc_wake_up(&NFS_SERVER(inode)->roc_rpcwaitq);
}
static bool
--
2.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
