Hi Ben,
On 11/18/2016 05:03 AM, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
While walking the list of lock_states, keep a reference on each
nfs4_lock_state to be checked, otherwise the lock state could be removed
while the check performs TEST_STATEID and possible FREE_STATEID.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 7897826d7c51..57d102d0f075 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -2564,15 +2564,23 @@ static void nfs41_check_delegation_stateid(struct nfs4_state *state)
static int nfs41_check_expired_locks(struct nfs4_state *state)
{
int status, ret = NFS_OK;
- struct nfs4_lock_state *lsp;
+ struct nfs4_lock_state *lsp, *prev = NULL;
struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(state->inode);
if (!test_bit(LK_STATE_IN_USE, &state->flags))
goto out;
+
+ spin_lock(&state->state_lock);
list_for_each_entry(lsp, &state->lock_states, ls_locks) {
if (test_bit(NFS_LOCK_INITIALIZED, &lsp->ls_flags)) {
struct rpc_cred *cred = lsp->ls_state->owner->so_cred;
+ atomic_inc(&lsp->ls_count);
+ spin_unlock(&state->state_lock);
+
+ nfs4_put_lock_state(prev);
+ prev = lsp;
+
status = nfs41_test_and_free_expired_stateid(server,
&lsp->ls_stateid,
cred);
@@ -2587,8 +2595,11 @@ static int nfs41_check_expired_locks(struct nfs4_state *state)
ret = status;
break;
Should this "break" be replaced with a "goto out" since we're no longer holding the lock at this point?
Thanks,
Anna
}
+ spin_lock(&state->state_lock);
}
- };
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&state->state_lock);
+ nfs4_put_lock_state(prev);
out:
return ret;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
