I received no comments for my RFC series I sent a week ago, so I'll
assume no-one objects :-)
I've revised the series a little. In particular I just add a
lockowner rather than a whole nfs_lock_context to the open_context.
I've also added to patches which combine to remove the nfs_lockowner
structure.
I think this is ready to be queued for -next
Thanks,
NeilBrown
---
NeilBrown (5):
NFS: remove l_pid field from nfs_lockowner
NFSv4: add flock_owner to open context
NFSv4: change nfs4_select_rw_stateid to take a lock_context inplace of lock_owner
NFSv4: enhance nfs4_copy_lock_stateid to use a flock stateid if there is one
NFS: discard nfs_lockowner structure.
fs/nfs/dir.c | 6 +++---
fs/nfs/inode.c | 14 +++++++-------
fs/nfs/nfs4_fs.h | 2 +-
fs/nfs/nfs4file.c | 2 +-
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 14 +++-----------
fs/nfs/nfs4state.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
fs/nfs/pagelist.c | 3 +--
fs/nfs/write.c | 3 +--
include/linux/nfs_fs.h | 10 +++-------
9 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
--
Signature
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
