On 21.09.2016 16:20, Jeff Layton wrote: > Good catch. I'm not very fond of the refcounting this here but it > should > serve the purpose and I don't have anything better to suggest. FWIW, I > think the nfsd_mutex is held during all of these operations so we > probably don't need atomics for the refcount. I've copied idea from netfilters, look at using of masquerade_notifier_refcount Perhaps someday in future we'll replace all such cases by some common primitive. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
