> On Sep 21, 2016, at 12:03, Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Trond, > > On 09/20/2016 12:55 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: >> In some cases (e.g. when the SEQ4_STATUS_EXPIRED_ALL_STATE_REVOKED sequence >> flag is set) we may already know that the stateid was revoked and that the >> only valid operation we can call is FREE_STATEID. In those cases, allow >> the stateid to carry the information in the type field, so that we skip >> the redundant call to TEST_STATEID. > > Would you like to add a Signed-off-by to this patch? :) Umm…. Yes… Sorry... ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��w���jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥