We actually want to use TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE sleeps when we're in the
process of polling for a NFSv4 lock. If there is a signal pending when
the task wakes up, then we'll be returning an error anyway. So, we might
as well wake up immediately for non-fatal signals as well. That allows
us to return to userland more quickly in that case, but won't change the
error that userland sees.
Also, there is no need to use the *_unsafe sleep variants here, as no
vfs-layer locks should be held at this point.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 9d38366666f4..73b2c883558e 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -5537,7 +5537,7 @@ int nfs4_proc_delegreturn(struct inode *inode, struct rpc_cred *cred, const nfs4
static unsigned long
nfs4_set_lock_task_retry(unsigned long timeout)
{
- freezable_schedule_timeout_killable_unsafe(timeout);
+ freezable_schedule_timeout_interruptible(timeout);
timeout <<= 1;
if (timeout > NFS4_LOCK_MAXTIMEOUT)
return NFS4_LOCK_MAXTIMEOUT;
--
2.7.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
