On 16/09/16 17:01, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>
>> On Sep 16, 2016, at 08:28, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Write space becoming available may race with putting the task to sleep
>> in xprt_wait_for_buffer_space(). The existing mechanism to avoid the
>> race does not work.
>>
>> This (edited) partial trace illustrates the problem:
>>
>> [1] rpc_task_run_action: task:43546@5 ... action=call_transmit
>> [2] xs_write_space <-xs_tcp_write_space
>> [3] xprt_write_space <-xs_write_space
>> [4] rpc_task_sleep: task:43546@5 ...
>> [5] xs_write_space <-xs_tcp_write_space
>>
>> [1] Task 43546 runs but is out of write space.
>>
>> [2] Space becomes available, xs_write_space() clears the
>> SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE bit.
>>
>> [3] xprt_write_space() attemts to wake xprt->snd_task (== 43546), but
>> this has not yet been queued and the wake up is lost.
>>
>> [4] xs_nospace() is called which calls xprt_wait_for_buffer_space()
>> which queues task 43546.
>>
>> [5] The call to sk->sk_write_space() at the end of xs_nospace() (which
>> is supposed to handle the above race) does not call
>> xprt_write_space() as the SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE bit is clear and
>> thus the task is not woken.
>>
>> Fix the race by have xprt_wait_for_buffer_space() check for write
>> space after putting the task to sleep.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h | 1 +
>> net/sunrpc/xprt.c | 4 ++++
>> net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
>> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
>> index a16070d..621e74b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
>> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ struct rpc_xprt_ops {
>> void (*connect)(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct rpc_task *task);
>> void * (*buf_alloc)(struct rpc_task *task, size_t size);
>> void (*buf_free)(void *buffer);
>> + bool (*have_write_space)(struct rpc_xprt *task);
>> int (*send_request)(struct rpc_task *task);
>> void (*set_retrans_timeout)(struct rpc_task *task);
>> void (*timer)(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct rpc_task *task);
>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
>> index ea244b2..d3c1b1e 100644
>> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
>> @@ -502,6 +502,10 @@ void xprt_wait_for_buffer_space(struct rpc_task *task, rpc_action action)
>>
>> task->tk_timeout = RPC_IS_SOFT(task) ? req->rq_timeout : 0;
>> rpc_sleep_on(&xprt->pending, task, action);
>> +
>> + /* Write space notification may race with putting task to sleep. */
>> + if (xprt->ops->have_write_space(xprt))
>> + rpc_wake_up_queued_task(&xprt->pending, task);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xprt_wait_for_buffer_space);
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
>> index bf16883..211de5b 100644
>> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
>> @@ -472,8 +472,6 @@ static int xs_nospace(struct rpc_task *task)
>>
>> spin_unlock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
>>
>> - /* Race breaker in case memory is freed before above code is called */
>> - sk->sk_write_space(sk);
>> return ret;
>> }
>
> Instead of these callbacks, why not just add a call to
> sk_set_bit(SOCKWQ_ASYNC_WAITDATA, sk) after queueing the task in
> xs_nospace()? Won’t that fix the existing race breaker?
I don't see how that would help. If sk->sk_write_space was already
called, SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE will still be clear and the next call to
sk->sk_write_space will still be a nop.
Or did you mean SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE here? It doesn't seem right to set
this bit when we don't know if there's space or not.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
