On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 13:39 -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > On 09/06/2016 11:12 AM, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > fs/nfs/callback_xdr.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback_xdr.c b/fs/nfs/callback_xdr.c > > index 656f68f7fe53..d6a40c06ec26 100644 > > --- a/fs/nfs/callback_xdr.c > > +++ b/fs/nfs/callback_xdr.c > > @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static int nfs4_encode_void(struct svc_rqst > > *rqstp, __be32 *p, void *dummy) > > return xdr_ressize_check(rqstp, p); > > } > > > > -static __be32 *read_buf(struct xdr_stream *xdr, int nbytes) > > +static __be32 *read_buf(struct xdr_stream *xdr, unsigned int > > nbytes) > > Looks like the nbytes argument is only used by xdr_inline_decode(), > which expects a size_t instead of an unsigned int. If we're changing > argument types, then maybe we should change it to a size_t instead. > > Thoughts? > Anna > Sure, that works too. I'd have a hard time imagining when we'd ever use those upper bits when size_t is 64 bits, but I doubt it'd hurt anything. I'll go ahead and change that in my tree. -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
